Success or Sellout?

Success or Sellout?

The U.S.-North Korean Nuclear Accord

January 1995 , 23 Pages

Task Force Report
Analysis and policy prescriptions of major foreign policy issues facing the United States, developed through private deliberations among a diverse and distinguished group of experts.

More on:

North Korea

Treaties and Agreements

Nonproliferation, Arms Control, and Disarmament

The U.S.-North Korean Agreed Framework of October 1994 holds the potential for resolving the Nuclear proliferation threat from the North, promoting stability on the Korean Peninsula, and furthering North-South dialogue. Yet it also could exacerbate tensions on the peninsula and introduce new problems into U.S. ties with both South Korea and Japan. The key now lies in Washington, Seoul, and Tokyo; how they manage the pact's implementation will determine—even more than its terms—whether the accords leads to good or ill.

This report—the result of an expert bipartisan task force—traces the history of the negotiations, explains what the accord contains, what it requires from the parties, and provides responses to commonly raised questions and criticisms. It also suggests some guidelines for the United States, South Korea, and Japan as they implement the agreement—or protect themselves against its failure.

More on:

North Korea

Treaties and Agreements

Nonproliferation, Arms Control, and Disarmament

Task Force Members

Kenneth L. Adelman

Byung-Joon Ahn

Chang-Yoon Choi

Yoichi Funabashi

Leslie H. Gelb

William Gleysteen, Jr.

Donald P. Gregg

Richard N. Haass

Hong-Choo Hyun

Arnold Kanter

Kyung Won Kim

Dong-Bok Lee

Jessica Tuchman Mathews

Don Oberdorfer

Douglas H. Paul

Nicholas Platt

Sang-Woo Rhee

Robert W. RisCassi

William Y. Smith

Stephen J. Solarz

Richard H. Solomon

Top Stories on CFR

South Korea

Yoon Suk-Yeol’s shocking declaration of ‘emergency martial law’ was a frontal assault on the integrity of South Korea’s hard-won democratic system.

Lebanon

An array of domestic and foreign powers are vying for influence in Lebanon, including the Lebanese Armed Forces, Hezbollah, Israel, Iran, Syria, and the United States.

China

China’s growing willingness to defy the international order, and its increasingly aggressive leadership, have led it to increasingly utilize economic coercion against countries it believes have defied China’s interests. This coercion can be powerful, and the United States and its partners have not been well-prepared for Beijing’s actions. The U.S. and others need to develop a response immediately.