Sustainable Development and the Open-Door Policy in China

May 05, 2000

Report

More on:

China

Capital Flows

How can one best explain China's remarkable economic growth during twenty-one years and its rise from autarky to world economic power? The exercise requires chutzpah; it demands simplification; it cries out for the trained capacity to present a unifying theme with a weighty set of policy implications. Fortunately the academic establishment possesses these traits in abundance. Examples range broadly from the socialist romantic to the capitalist romantics; the former believing that China has developed its own and specifically noncapitalist path, the latter that it is transforming itself into a free-market system.The two camps hurl paper missiles at each other in a satisfying postlude to the Cold War.

But this battle is not, alas, about China. At least, it is not about China specifically. It is about economics, the economics profession, the indoctrination of students and policy analysts, and the politically and academically correct set of beliefs for those who practice development. As a result, it bears an eerie resemblance to the long history of policy discussions in China itself, which similarly are not about the actual problems of the country. Rather, they focus on the correct line and the ascendancy of adherents of one line over the adherents of another.

More on:

China

Capital Flows

Up

Explore More on CFR

Russia

If the President wants to use an arms build-up to advance arms control, he should take his cues from the Reagan record.

Yemen

The Gulf nation’s ground troops have cultivated alliances in Yemen with local armed groups, but its ability to shape the civil war’s outcome is limited.

U.S. Foreign Policy

U.S. competition with China continues to intensify, but rather than adopting a strategy of containment, the United States should respond by reinforcing its relationships with allies and leveraging China's desire for stability to discourage disruptive behavior.