Using Oil Taxes to Improve Fiscal Reform

A CFR Energy Brief

February 6, 2013

Report

More on:

Fossil Fuels

Budget, Debt, and Deficits

United States

Overview

Economists have long argued that taxing oil consumption would be the most efficient way to address U.S. vulnerability to overpriced and unreliable oil supplies. Yet energy taxes are a third rail in American politics. As a practical matter, then, significant increases in oil taxes have long been off the table as a policy tool. Mounting concern over rising U.S. deficits, however, has recently prompted some people to question whether that might change. Policymakers are confronting difficult choices. Shrinking the yawning U.S. budget deficit would require some mix of higher tax revenues and reduced government spending that extends well beyond the recent legislation that addressed the so-called fiscal cliff. In this Energy Brief, Daniel Ahn and Michael Levi model the potential consequences of substituting taxes on oil consumption for either higher nonoil taxes or reduced government spending, both as part of a larger deficit reduction package, and argue that doing so can improve economic performance while reducing oil consumption if done right.

Daniel P. Ahn
Daniel P. Ahn

Adjunct Fellow for Energy

Michael Levi
Michael Levi

David M. Rubenstein Senior Fellow for Energy and the Environment and Director of the Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies

Download the technical supplement to this report [PDF].

More on:

Fossil Fuels

Budget, Debt, and Deficits

United States

Top Stories on CFR

Election 2024

Each Friday, I look at what the presidential contenders are saying about foreign policy. This Week: Republicans are gathering in Milwaukee next week optimistic about their chances in November.  

France

The surprising shift to the left in snap elections has broken the far-right populist fever in France, but now a crisis of governability looms in Paris that has further weakened President Emmanuel Macron’s grip on power.

Iran

President-Elect Masoud Pezeshkian campaigned as a moderate regarding issues such as the hijab law and nuclear negotiations, but the regime is unlikely to allow any sweeping changes.