Why a “Nuclear Deal” With Pakistan Is Not Realistic, Timely, or Wise

House Committee on Foreign Affairs Hearing, “Civil Nuclear Cooperation with Pakistan: Prospects and Consequences”

December 8, 2015

Testimony
Testimony by CFR fellows and experts before Congress.

Testifying before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Adjunct Senior Fellow for India, Pakistan, and South Asia Daniel S. Markey discussed the ramifications of a potential civil nuclear agreement with Pakistan. He concluded that pursuing a nuclear deal with Pakistan at this time is unrealistic, poorly timed, and unwise. 

A serviceman from Pakistan is watched by a referee as he fires an anti-aircraft missile.

Main Takeaways:

More on:

Pakistan

Nonproliferation, Arms Control, and Disarmament

  • Not only is the discussion surrounding a nuclear deal poorly timed, it would be more likely to prove counterproductive to other near term U.S. security interests.
  • Pakistan is unlikely to agree to any deal that limits the future growth of its nuclear program, as there is nothing Washington can offer that would make Islamabad take steps it believes are contrary to vital national security interests.
  • Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal has always been justified as a deterrent against Indian aggression, and there is no indication that Pakistan’s military leadership is inclined to place voluntary limits on the growth of its nuclear program. India, as a rising power, is expanding its military to compete not only with Islamabad but also with Beijing, and this triangular security dilemma between China, India, and Pakistan favors persistent competition, most of all by the weakest player.
  • These more pressing, non-nuclear concerns for U.S. policymakers include the Pakistani military’s selective targeting of militant and terrorist groups, the Islamabad’s commitment to advancing any “reconciliation” process with the Afghan Taliban, continually troubled relations with India, and ongoing counterterror and counterinsurgency campaigns inside Pakistan.

More on:

Pakistan

Nonproliferation, Arms Control, and Disarmament

Top Stories on CFR

United States

Each Friday, I look at what the presidential contenders are saying about foreign policy. This Week: Joe Biden doesn’t want one of America’s closest allies to buy a once iconic American company.

Immigration and Migration

Dara Lind, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, sits down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the record surge in migrants and asylum seekers crossing the U.S. southern border.

Center for Preventive Action

Every January, CFR’s annual Preventive Priorities Survey analyzes the conflicts most likely to occur in the year ahead and measures their potential impact. For the first time, the survey anticipates that this year, 2024, the United States will contend not only with a slew of global threats, but also a high risk of upheaval within its own borders. Is the country prepared for the eruption of election-related instability at home while wars continue to rage abroad?