The Opportunity

The Opportunity

In this book, CFR President Richard N. Haass offers a concise and engaging analysis of international relations and American Foreign policy in the post-Cold War era. Haass argues that the United States sits at a unique juncture in world history, one in which much of what it seeks to achieve in the world has the potential to be broadly acceptable to other major powers. Teaching notes by the author.

October 1, 2006 12:00 am (EST)

Teaching Notes

The Opportunity describes an unprecedented moment in which the United States has a chance to bring about a world where most people are safe, free, and can enjoy a decent standard of living. The book is suitable for general courses on international relations or American foreign policy, specialized courses on the theory and practice of international relations, and specialized courses on issues in American foreign policy.

More From Our Experts

The Opportunity will help students in an introductory undergraduate course understand the major issues and challenges in international relations and American foreign policy today. It identifies the trade-offs and dilemmas that American policymakers will confront as they decide how the United States should engage the world.

More on:

United States

Politics and Government

The Opportunity will enable students in upper-division courses to explore the nature of international relations and to assess the merits of contending strategies for guiding American foreign policy. It also provides students with the chance to evaluate contending theories of international relations.

Teaching Notes Components

General International Relations or American Foreign Policy Courses

Discussion Questions

  1. What are the principal features of today's international system?
  2. Does the United States need a foreign policy doctrine to help navigate the world? Why or why not?
  3. Define the doctrine of integration. What are its strengths, weaknesses, and the arguments for and against its adoption? Are there alternative doctrines you would suggest? What are their comparative strengths and weaknesses?
  4. How does the doctrine of integration apply to such challenges as terrorism? Nuclear proliferation? Global climate change? Free trade?
  5. Is it possible for the United States to accept or even support the rise of nations such as China and India and simultaneously promote its own interests? If so, how could this best be done?
  6. Assess the merits of the claim "The United States does not need the world's permission to act, but it does need the world's support to succeed."


  1. Does the United States have a unique opportunity today to bring about a world where most people are safe, free, and can enjoy a decent standard of living?
  2. Is it legitimate for countries to intervene in the affairs of other countries for humanitarian reasons?
  3. Should American policymakers worry whether the rest of the world sees U.S. actions abroad as legitimate?
More From Our Experts

Mock National Security Council Meeting

Assign the various positions on the President's National Security Council team. Discuss the merits of various possible approaches the United States could pursue in response to the nuclear challenges posed by Iran and North Korea.

Advanced Courses in the Theory and Practice of International Relations

Discussion Questions

  1. In order to lead an international trend toward integration, the United States government needs both the support of its own population as well as the support of the other major governments of the world. Given what some observers see as a rise of anti-Americanism in many places around the world, including among the United States's democratic allies in Europe, what steps should the U.S. government take so that leaders of the other major powers can be both willing and able to join the United States in facing transnational threats and opportunities without facing backlash from their own populations?
  2. What do you foresee as the major issues of political dispute among the U.S. population, media, and Congress if the U.S. president were to express his or her intent to implement a foreign policy dominated by the doctrine of integration?
  3. What are the arguments a president should use to convince the population and Congress of the merits of this doctrine?
  4. What are the arguments you would suggest a leader of a foreign government or U.S. Congressperson use in opposition to integration?

More on:

United States

Politics and Government


  1. Does the United States have the capacity to successfully implement a doctrine of integration that results in Haass's vision of a world where most people are safe, free, and can enjoy a decent standard of living? If so, what will be the most serious domestic challenges to implementing this strategy? What will be the greatest external challenges?
  2. If foreign nations that are vital to the implementation of a doctrine of integration seek to act against or outside of this system of U.S. leadership, what are the repercussions for international relations and U.S. foreign policy?
  3. Which nations do you predict to be most likely to attempt to buck a U.S.-led system? How should the United States respond?


Assign students one of two roles. Group A will be assigned the role of National Security Council staffer and will have the responsibility of drafting the foreign policy aspect of the president's State of the Union address presenting to Congress, the American people, and the world the new U.S. policy of integration. Group B will be assigned the role of a Congressional foreign policy staffer responsible for drafting a response for their respective representative or senator presenting the argument against integration and making a case for an alternative. Students present their arguments in class, opening with the State of the Union and followed by Congressional rebuttal, after which students can discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each position.

Visit the Book Page

Download the Teaching Notes


Top Stories on CFR

Genocide and Mass Atrocities

Thirty years ago, Rwanda’s government began a campaign to eradicate the country’s largest minority group. In just one hundred days in 1994, roving militias killed around eight hundred thousand people. Would-be killers were incited to violence by the radio, which encouraged extremists to take to the streets with machetes. The United Nations stood by amid the bloodshed, and many foreign governments, including the United States, declined to intervene before it was too late. What got in the way of humanitarian intervention? And as violent conflict now rages at a clip unseen since then, can the international community learn from the mistakes of its past?


The IMF and World Bank’s spring meetings will focus on the prospects for a soft landing after years of global economic turbulence. But major challenges remain, including growing climate finance needs and persistently high global debt levels.

South Korea

The center-left Democratic Party added to its legislative majority after the recent parliamentary election, which would deal a blow to President Yoon Suk Yeol’s domestic reform agenda and possibly his efforts to improve ties with Japan.