from Follow the Money

More Bolsa Familia, smaller fuel subsidies

November 3, 2006

Blog Post
Blog posts represent the views of CFR fellows and staff and not those of CFR, which takes no institutional positions.

More on:

Emerging Markets

That seems to be the IMF’s message to Latin America.    The latest regional outlook lauded programs like Brazil’s Bolsa Familia:

“These and other social assistance programs show considerable progress as a tool for poverty reduction as they successful target spending on the needy.” 

Interestingly, the IMF found that Chile spends more on these kinds of programs (1.5% of GDP for “Chile Solidaro”) than Brazil (which spends about 1% of its GDP).     And that spending on these kinds of programs generally pales relative to the 6.5% of GDP implicit fuel subsidy in Ecuador, where domestic fuel prices are frozen at 2003 levels.

No wonder Ecuador seems to be about the only oil exporter than doesn't have a significant current account surplus with oil close to $60. 

While SUVs may be a big part of the middle-class lifestyle in the US, I suspect cheap gas benefits the upper-income brackets in Ecuador rather more than Ecuador’s middle class. 

Another interesting tidbit in the IMF report:  The productivity of Mexico’s VAT is only ½ that of Chile’s.   Even Argentina does better.   Who would have thunk.   

Indeed, I thought the IMF’s regional outlook did a nice job with a range of cross-national comparisons – and did a good job of putting the “Changing oil and natural gas fiscal regime in the Andean countries” in a broad global context, one where all commodity-rich countries are looking “to secure a greater share of the windfall profits” from high commodity prices.

UPDATE: the implicit subsidy required to keep petrol at 12 cents a gallon in Venezuela must be large.  Venezuela still has -- I think -- a current account surplus, but I think it is also running a fiscal deficit.  That takes a bit of effort with oil at $60 ...

More on:

Emerging Markets