Washington Must Rebuild Trust With Silicon Valley to Meet Cyber Threats, Argues Segal in New Report

Cyber threats are escalating in sophistication and magnitude, but mistrust between Washington and Silicon Valley continues to stymie progress on cybersecurity. In a new Council Special Report, Adam Segal examines the security risks exacerbated by the divide between government and the technology community and offers policy recommendations to help restore trust.

January 27, 2017

News Releases

Cyber threats to the United States are escalating in sophistication and magnitude, but mistrust between Washington and Silicon Valley continues to stymie progress on cybersecurity. In a new Council Special Report, Adam Segal examines the security risks exacerbated by the divide between government and the technology community and offers policy recommendations to help restore trust.

More From Our Experts

“In addition to rising cybersecurity threats, the [Donald J.] Trump administration will inherit a growing political divide between Washington and U.S. tech firms that stems in large part from the disclosures by NSA contractor Edward Snowden,” writes Segal, the Council on Foreign Relations’ Ira A. Lipman chair in emerging technologies and national security and director of the Digital and Cyberspace Policy program.

More on:

United States

Cybersecurity

Capital Flows

“Although numerous government officials have traveled to Silicon Valley over the past several years, narrowing the gap will not be easy in part because technology firms operating as global platforms have strong economic motivations to keep Washington at a distance. Potential adversaries will continue to use hardware and software developed by U.S. companies and thus law enforcement and intelligence agencies will persist in exploiting the vulnerabilities in these products,” he adds.

Segal asserts that “repairing the rift will not be easy, but there are areas where the two sides can find common ground.” The report, Rebuilding Trust Between Silicon Valley and Washington, notes that the two sides can work together to:

    More From Our Experts

    More on:

    United States

    Cybersecurity

    Capital Flows

  • Create a vibrant cyber workforce. The private sector and the U.S. government both benefit from growing the labor pool of qualified cyber professionals.
  • Fight the global trend of forced data localization. U.S. tech companies and the U.S. government share an interest in opposing requiring tech companies operating abroad to store data locally.
  • Deter state attackers. “Although companies must improve their own defenses, policies taken to deter the most sophisticated state actors would be an important step in reducing the threats and thus restoring some measure of confidence in the technology sector that the government can effectively address the cybersecurity challenge.”
  • Forge a compromise over the deployment and use of encryption and lawful access to data. “A broad policy and legal debate to define the parameters of the hacking, followed by strict judicial oversight, would ensure that lawful hacking is used responsibly, much like the restrictions that already apply to wiretapping.”

Segal also outlines several policies the U.S. government should pursue on these issues:

If you are interested in speaking with Segal, please contact Andrew Palladino at 212.434.9888 or apalladino@cfr.org.

Up
Close

Explore More on CFR

 

Nuclear Weapons

Nearly all nuclear weapon states, as a matter of policy, remain ready to use their weapons without having first suffered a nuclear attack.

Russia