from Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies

The Impact of Removing Tax Preferences for U.S. Oil and Gas Production

August 2, 2016

Report

More on:

Energy and Climate Policy

Fossil Fuels

Budget, Debt, and Deficits

United States

Overview

The tax treatment of oil and gas investment in the United States has been a contentious policy issue for decades. Reform advocates argue that eliminating tax preferences for producers of oil and gas could increase government revenues by billions of dollars each year while defenders of the existing tax regime contend that changing it would lead to large declines in domestic oil and gas production and to significant job destruction. Against the backdrop of low oil prices and increased domestic production, Gilbert E. Metcalf models firm behavior in response to the potential loss of each of the three major tax preferences in the United States. The potential losses are measured as equivalent price impact (EPI), the percentage drop in the price of oil or gas that would reduce the profitability of drilling a well as much as tax reform would.

The author finds that removing tax preferences would increase the global price of oil by only 1 percent by 2030. Domestic oil production could drop 5 percent and global consumption could fall by less than 1 percent in that timeframe. Meanwhile, domestic natural gas prices could rise between 7 and 10 percent, and both domestic gas production and consumption could fall between 3 and 4 percent. The author concludes that the estimated effects of removing the preferences on energy prices, domestic production, and global consumption suggest that none of the three preferences directly and materially improve U.S. energy security or mitigate climate change. If eliminated, however, they could enhance U.S. influence to advocate for international climate action and generate fiscal savings. 

Selected Figures From This Report

Gilbert Metcalf

Professor of Economics, Tufts University

How Much Oil Prices Would Have to Fall to Decrease Marginal Profitability as Much as Repealing All Tax Preferences Would


How Much Oil Prices Would Have to Fall to Decrease Marginal Profitability as Much as Repealing Each Tax Preference for Independent Producers Would


How Much Oil Prices Would Have to Fall to Decrease Marginal Profitability as Much as Repealing Each Tax Preference for Integrated Producers Would


How Much Natural Gas Prices Would Have to Fall to Decrease Marginal Well Profitability as Much as Repealing All Three Tax Preferences Would


Global Oil Market Effects of U.S. Tax Reform


Domestic Natural Gas Market Effects of U.S. Tax Reform

More on:

Energy and Climate Policy

Fossil Fuels

Budget, Debt, and Deficits

United States

Top Stories on CFR

United States

Each Friday, I look at what the presidential contenders are saying about foreign policy. This Week: Joe Biden doesn’t want one of America’s closest allies to buy a once iconic American company.

Immigration and Migration

Dara Lind, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, sits down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the record surge in migrants and asylum seekers crossing the U.S. southern border.

Center for Preventive Action

Every January, CFR’s annual Preventive Priorities Survey analyzes the conflicts most likely to occur in the year ahead and measures their potential impact. For the first time, the survey anticipates that this year, 2024, the United States will contend not only with a slew of global threats, but also a high risk of upheaval within its own borders. Is the country prepared for the eruption of election-related instability at home while wars continue to rage abroad?