from Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies

Responding to AIIB

U.S. Leadership at the Multilateral Development Banks in a New Era

September 01, 2016

Report

More on:

Banking

Global Governance

Asia

Overview

Last year’s launch of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)—a new multilateral development bank with fifty-seven sovereign members, among them some of the United States’ closest allies—is appropriately viewed as a diplomatic and strategic victory for the Chinese government. In the face of growing U.S. indifference to multilateral development institutions, China is stepping up. As the Chinese were opening the AIIB’s doors in early 2015, the U.S. Congress still had failed to act on a 2010 IMF governance reform package that other major countries considered essential, and across the MDBs, U.S. officials were viewed more as obstacles to than as champions for an ambitious development agenda.

Scott Morris

Senior Fellow and Director of the Rethinking U.S. Development Policy Initiative, Center for Global Development

A year later, this dramatic narrative may seem less starkly defined. But the circumstances around the creation of the AIIB have usefully brought to light a longer trend that will ultimately lead to a diminution of U.S. leadership in the multilateral development system, brought about as much by the United States itself as by external challengers. China was successful in attracting so many countries to join the AIIB by offering more infrastructure financing (and all that implies in terms of procurement and commercial opportunities) at a time when the prospect for additional financing appeared limited within the core MDBs, in large part due to U.S. resistance.

The task for U.S. officials in the years ahead will be to accommodate a larger role for emerging countries, particularly China, in the multilateral development bank system, but to do so from a position of strength and with ambition for the MDBs in U.S. policy. The alternative, in which the United States neither makes space for new voices nor promotes the MDBs themselves, will inevitably lead to a weaker system that will harm the United States and the global good. 

Selected Figures From This Report

Timeline of MDB Establishment

Aggregate National Voting Power in Multilateral Development Banks

Infrastructure Share of Assistance Portfolio 2010-2012

China's Dominant Infrastructure Focus

U.S. Opposition to Multilateral Development Bank Projects

Unmet U.S. Commitments to Multilateral Development Banks

Channels of U.S. Influence over Chinese Development Policy

More on:

Banking

Global Governance

Asia

Top Stories on CFR

International Organizations

The 2022 FIFA World Cup has kicked off in Qatar, and billions of fans worldwide are tuning in to the world’s most popular live event. And yet as in years past, the Qatar Cup is transpiring under the shadow of controversy.

Middle East and North Africa

The kafala system regulates the lives of tens of millions of migrant laborers in the Middle East, but growing outrage over human rights abuses, racism, and gender discrimination has fueled calls for reform.

COVID-19

Government leaders are optimistic that COVID-19 is becoming endemic, meaning more predictable and manageable. But many scientists say it’s too soon to behave like the pandemic is over.