Council of Councils
Think Global Health
Online Store
Introduction
Over the last several decades, governments have collectively pledged to slow global warming. But despite intensified diplomacy, the world is already facing the consequences of climate…
Cybersecurity Debate: Three Things to Know
April 27, 2015 12:40 pm (EST)
- Explainer Video
The debate over cybersecurity is heating up again in Washington. Congress is considering multiple pieces of legislation intended to enhance the ability of the private sector and government to share information about digital threats. Meanwhile, the White House has put forth its own proposal, which diverges from those measures on major issues. Robert Knake, CFR’s senior fellow for cyber policy, offers three things to know about the debate on cybersecurity information sharing.
More From Our Experts
Expanded Monitoring: Congress and the White House generally agree on the need for the private sector and government to share intelligence about cyber threats. Where they diverge is on the extent to which private service providers, such as AT&T and Verizon, can monitor Internet traffic, explains Knake.
Improved Sharing: Most companies already monitor their networks for threats and share cybersecurity information with other firms and government, says Knake. President Barack Obama’s proposal would simply clarify that authority, while bills supported by the Congressional intelligence committees would allow ISPs to monitor all traffic crossing their networks.
Choosing a Portal: President Obama wants cybersecurity information shared between the government and the private sector to pass through the Department of Homeland Security, while congressional intelligence committees want the National Security Agency to be the hub. These divisions do not fall along partisan lines, says Knake.
More From Our Experts
Top Stories on CFR
Yoon Suk-Yeol’s shocking declaration of ‘emergency martial law’ was a frontal assault on the integrity of South Korea’s hard-won democratic system.
An array of domestic and foreign powers are vying for influence in Lebanon, including the Lebanese Armed Forces, Hezbollah, Israel, Iran, Syria, and the United States.
China’s growing willingness to defy the international order, and its increasingly aggressive leadership, have led it to increasingly utilize economic coercion against countries it believes have defied China’s interests. This coercion can be powerful, and the United States and its partners have not been well-prepared for Beijing’s actions. The U.S. and others need to develop a response immediately.