Hurricane Sandy and Climate Change: Three Things to Know

Hurricane Sandy and Climate Change: Three Things to Know

November 5, 2012 5:25 pm (EST)

Hurricane Sandy and Climate Change: Three Things to Know
Explainer Video

Hurricane Sandy has rekindled a debate about the causes and consequences of climate change. Michael A. Levi, CFR’s David M. Rubenstein Senior Fellow for Energy and the Environment, highlights three lessons to be learned from Sandy’s impact:

More From Our Experts
  • Reducing Vulnerability – "The hurricane and its devastating aftermath has reminded us that no matter how wealthy our society is and how developed we are, we are still vulnerable to dangerous extremes of weather," says Levi. The focus needs to be on reducing vulnerability and improving resilience to natural disasters "regardless of whether they are man-made or otherwise," he says.
  • Minimizing Risks – "Increased human emissions of greenhouse gases are leading to more risk of dangerous weather extremes," Levi says. Reducing this risk requires cutting U.S. and global greenhouse gas emissions, he says.
  • Increasing Global Cooperation – In Sandy’s aftermath, "communities have gotten past traditional divides, and particularly partisan divides," Levi emphasizes. At the international level, the United States should similarly seize on opportunities to work collaboratively with other countries on climate change challenges, Levi says.

Top Stories on CFR


Far-right candidate Geert Wilders emerged as the biggest political force in Dutch politics in November’s general elections. What does his win mean for the Netherlands and Europe?


Myanmar's military has recently suffered a string of defeats—but the U.S. government seems unprepared to face the country's potential state collapse.


The authors, including a former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, UN Undersecretary-General for Legal Affairs, Founding Chief Prosecutor of the UN Special Court for Sierra Leone, and the inaugural U.S. Ambassador at Large for War Crimes Issues, urge the imperative of prosecuting alleged Russian crimes of aggression in Ukraine, and present two practical options for doing so.