International Cooperation in 2015 Deserves a B Grade, Say Global Think Tank Leaders
from Council of Councils

International Cooperation in 2015 Deserves a B Grade, Say Global Think Tank Leaders

A new Report Card on International Cooperation from the Council of Councils finds that multilateral action on most of the critical transnational threats has shown progress, but is still inadequate in addressing terrorism and other violent conflicts.

May 18, 2016 11:22 am (EST)

News Releases

A new Report Card on International Cooperation finds that multilateral action on most of the critical transnational threats has shown progress, but is still inadequate in addressing terrorism and other violent conflicts. The Council of Councils, a Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) initiative comprising twenty-six major international policy institutes, surveyed the heads of member think tanks to evaluate the world’s performance on ten of the most important issues of 2015. It offered the following grades:

More From Our Experts
  • Mitigating and Adapting to Climate Change: A
  • Preventing Nuclear Proliferation: A-
  • Advancing Development: B+
  • Promoting Global Health: B+
  • Expanding Global Trade: B
  • Managing the Global Economic System: B-
  • Managing Cyber Governance: B-
  • Preventing and Responding to Violent Conflict Between States: C
  • Combating Transnational Terrorism: C-
  • Preventing and Responding to Internal Violent Conflict: C-

More on:

Global

Global Governance

Respondents agreed that efforts did not worsen for any of the issues, with grades on nine of ten issues improving since last year’s survey. They awarded overall global cooperation efforts in 2015 a B grade.

Although seven issues received a B- or higher, “these were offset by dismal performance with respect to terrorism and internal conflict,” said CFR President Richard N. Haass. “The inability to end the Syrian war, which caused waves of refugees to stream into Europe from the Middle East, was one of the major failures of international cooperation in 2015.”

Think tank leaders agreed that the three issues that received the lowest grades in 2015—combating transnational terrorism, preventing violent conflict between states, and preventing internal violent conflict—were still the most pressing challenges to tackle in 2016. “The Syria crisis caused huge problems not only in its own region but also in neighboring regions,” noted Chen Dongxiao of the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies in his assessment of internal violent conflict.

More From Our Experts

Due in large part to the Paris Agreement reached in December 2015, respondents agreed that the challenge of mitigating and adapting to climate change offered the most hope for progress. While the Paris Talks have not resulted in a perfect agreement, “we have seen a breakthrough diplomatic success and the first agreement by all 195 participating states to fight climate change,” said Volker Perthes, head of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.

Explore the interactive Council of Councils Report Card on International Cooperation at www.cfr.org/councilofcouncils/reportcard. Learn more about the methodology here.

More on:

Global

Global Governance

This report was made possible by the generous support of the Robina Foundation.

Close

Top Stories on CFR

United States

Each Friday, I look at what the presidential contenders are saying about foreign policy. This Week: Joe Biden doesn’t want one of America’s closest allies to buy a once iconic American company.

Immigration and Migration

Dara Lind, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, sits down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the record surge in migrants and asylum seekers crossing the U.S. southern border.

Center for Preventive Action

Every January, CFR’s annual Preventive Priorities Survey analyzes the conflicts most likely to occur in the year ahead and measures their potential impact. For the first time, the survey anticipates that this year, 2024, the United States will contend not only with a slew of global threats, but also a high risk of upheaval within its own borders. Is the country prepared for the eruption of election-related instability at home while wars continue to rage abroad?