Reducing Deforestation to Fight Climate Change
Report from Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies
Report from Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies

Reducing Deforestation to Fight Climate Change

Insights From a CFR Workshop

September 2015

Report

Overview

Deforestation is a major man-made source of greenhouse gas emissions, and is especially significant in countries with large tropical forests, including Brazil and Indonesia as well as countries in Central Africa, like the Democratic Republic of Congo. Forests naturally act as a storage unit, or "sink," for carbon emissions into the atmosphere, absorbing about one-third of the carbon dioxide emitted by cars, power plants, and factories every year. But forests, when cut down, are also a source of emissions as they release the carbon stored in their leaves, trunks, and roots into the atmosphere. In recent years, many policymakers have come to see reductions in deforestation (or "avoided deforestation") as a potentially low-cost way to curb greenhouse gas emissions. To achieve these reductions, they have pursued a range of approaches, from tougher local and national legislation prohibiting the destruction of forests to financial incentives for protecting them. Yet there is widespread agreement among analysts that the full hoped-for potential of avoided deforestation has not been realized.

The Maurice R. Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) hosted a workshop designed to draw lessons from Brazil's recent success at limiting deforestation, understand why countries such as Indonesia have so far struggled, and identify ways to further reduce deforestation. The workshop, involving roughly two dozen participants including corporate decision-makers, economists, scientists, nongovernmental organization (NGO) leaders, investors, and current and former policymakers, set out to unpack the roles played by government policy, civil society pressure, technology, and private sector initiatives in countering deforestation with a view to understanding how best to limit it in the future. This report, which you can download here, summarizes the discussion's highlights. The report reflects the views of workshop participants alone; CFR takes no position on policy issues.

Framing Questions for the Workshop

Deforestation in Climate Change Policy

More on:

Climate Change

Forests and Land Management

How significant a contributor to climate change is deforestation? How significant will it be in the future? How much might avoided deforestation be reasonably expected to contribute to climate change mitigation? What are recent and expected trends in Amazonian deforestation? What are the economic and political factors contributing to deforestation in the Amazon? How is Brazil engaging in international climate diplomacy with respect to deforestation?                           

Government-Driven Efforts to Reduce Deforestation

How much of the avoided deforestation "opportunity" is likely to be exploited through government driven initiatives, whether they involve one or more country (bilateral or multilateral) or are purely domestic? What is the state of public sector support for international initiatives to reduce emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD+)? Through carbon markets? Through direct payments from governments? Could the inclusion of deforestation goals, or other related elements, in a Paris agreement encourage additional and effective support from donor countries? Are there other opportunities for international political leverage on avoided deforestation that are not primarily centered on paying for avoided deforestation?

International Private Sector Initiatives to Curb Deforestation

How have private sector-led moratoria on deforestation functioned in Brazil? How significant a factor have they been in influencing deforestation? What concurrent factors (e.g., passage or enforcement of deforestation laws, public and consumer attention, availability of finance) have contributed to the efficacy of the voluntary initiatives? What lessons could other governments, sectors, or companies learn from the Brazilian experience, and are there ways to encourage such learning? Are there steps short of regulation that can governments (whether in Brazil or elsewhere) could take to encourage additional private sector action and make it enduring?

Charts From This Report

Figure 1


Figure 2 

More on:

Climate Change

Forests and Land Management

Top Stories on CFR

Drug Policy

President Trump has imposed steep tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico in the name of curbing fentanyl flows into the United States. In reality, supplies of the drug—and related deaths—have sharply declined in the past year, though they are still at worrying levels.

United States

Panelists discuss how U.S. policy toward Russia may shift under a second Trump administration, including the use of sanctions, the continued war in Ukraine, Russia’s military capabilities, the political dynamics inside the Kremlin, and broader U.S. engagement with Moscow. This meeting is part of CFR’s Transition 2025 series, which examines the major foreign policy issues confronting the Trump administration. If you wish to attend virtually, log-in information and instructions on how to participate during the question and answer portion will be provided the evening before the event to those who register. Please note the audio, video, and transcript of this hybrid meeting will be posted on the CFR website.

RealEcon

The United States’ relationship with China is at a new low, but Trump has a chance to redefine bilateral relations by locking China into the U.S.-led global system