Hey, Remember the Olympics?

Hosting the Olympics is a monumental undertaking that often leaves behind rusted stadiums and financial losses. So why do nations compete to do it? This episode examines the political history of the games, and the soft power that countries hope to gain by hosting them.

Play Button Pause Button
0:00 0:00
x
Host
  • Gabrielle Sierra
    Director, Podcasting
Credits

Asher Ross - Supervising Producer

Markus Zakaria - Audio Producer and Sound Designer

Rafaela Siewert - Associate Podcast Producer

Episode Guests
  • Jules Boykoff
    Professor of Political Science, Pacific University
  • Katharine Moon
    Professor of Political Science, Wellesley College

Show Notes

The 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo have been postponed, but Japan is still working around the clock to preserve them. And they aren’t alone in their zeal. Despite mounting evidence that hosting the games leads to bloated budgets and white elephant infrastructure, the soft-power appeal of the Olympics lives on. In this episode, experts weigh in on the geopolitical role of the global games, and discuss whether lighting the torch on your own turf is worth the investment.

 

From CFR

 

Andrew Zimbalist on Costs of the Olympics,” James M. Lindsay, The President’s Inbox

 

The Economics of Hosting the Olympic Games,” James McBride

 

China’s Olympic Nightmare,” Elizabeth Economy, Foreign Affairs

 

Will South Korea's Olympic Diplomacy Last?,” Scott A. Snyder

 

The Mixed Record of Sports Diplomacy,” Eleanor Albert and Jonathan Grix


Read More

 

The Olympics are political. The IOC ban denies reality—and athletes their voice.,” Jules Boykoff, NBC

 

The Tokyo Olympics’ Staggering Price Tag and Where It Stands in History,” Wall Street Journal 

 

As Covid Cases Hit Record High in Tokyo, Can the Olympic Bubble Hold?,” New York Times

 

How Olympians Are Fighting to Put Athletes' Mental Health First,” TIME

 

Skipping the Olympics is ‘not an option’ for many advertisers,” New York Times

 

Olympic Protest Rules: Tweets Are Fine, Kneeling Is Not,” New York Times

 

The Olympics Have Always Been Political,” Atlantic 

 

The Solution to Beijing’s Soft-Power Deficit Is Staring It in the Face,” Foreign Policy 

 

Olympic athletes are banned from protesting at Tokyo Games, IOC says,” Business Insider

 

From unfazed to unprecedented: Inside the decision to postpone the Olympics,” Washington Post

 

The Coronavirus and the Postponement of the Olympics, Explained,” New York Times

 

The Rise and Fall of Soft Power,” Foreign Policy


Watch or Listen

 

Politics and the Olympics,” Guardian 

 

18 Times Politics Trumped Sport in Olympic Games’ History,” Global Citizen

 

Why Hosting The Olympics Isn’t Worth It Anymore,” Business Insider

 

The story behind this iconic Olympics protest,” Vox

 

The Tokyo 2020 Olympics have been postponed to 2021,” CNN 

 

Olympics Meets Politics,” New York Times    

Center for Preventive Action

Every January, CFR’s annual Preventive Priorities Survey analyzes the conflicts most likely to occur in the year ahead and measures their potential impact. For the first time, the survey anticipates that this year, 2024, the United States will contend not only with a slew of global threats, but also a high risk of upheaval within its own borders. Is the country prepared for the eruption of election-related instability at home while wars continue to rage abroad?

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Billions of people will take to the polls next year, marking the world’s largest-ever electoral field. But this historic scale is not the only thing that will make 2024 unique. As new threats like deep fakes become cheaper and more widespread, these upcoming elections could serve as a test run for democracy in the artificial intelligence (AI) era. What risks does AI pose to elections next year? And will a surge in AI-powered disinformation change the nature of democratic elections?

Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Scenes from the Israel-Hamas war have reverberated across the world. In the United States, debate about the conflict has intensified, and it has resurfaced long-standing questions about policy toward Israel and the Palestinian territories. What is the U.S. goal for the region? And how is the United States responding to the war?

Top Stories on CFR

United States

Each Friday, I look at what the presidential contenders are saying about foreign policy. This Week: Joe Biden doesn’t want one of America’s closest allies to buy a once iconic American company.

Immigration and Migration

Dara Lind, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, sits down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the record surge in migrants and asylum seekers crossing the U.S. southern border.

Center for Preventive Action

Every January, CFR’s annual Preventive Priorities Survey analyzes the conflicts most likely to occur in the year ahead and measures their potential impact. For the first time, the survey anticipates that this year, 2024, the United States will contend not only with a slew of global threats, but also a high risk of upheaval within its own borders. Is the country prepared for the eruption of election-related instability at home while wars continue to rage abroad?