Robots That Kill

Militaries around the world are designing artificial intelligence–powered weapons that could one day make their own decisions about who to target. The technology could change the scope of warfare, but at what cost?

Play Button Pause Button
0:00 0:00
x
Host
  • Gabrielle Sierra
    Director, Podcasting
Credits

Asher Ross - Supervising Producer

Markus Zakaria - Audio Producer and Sound Designer

Rafaela Siewert - Associate Podcast Producer

Jeremy Sherlick - Senior Producer

Episode Guests
  • Paul Scharre
    Senior Fellow and Director of the Technology and National Security Program, Center for a New American Security
  • Toby Walsh
    Professor of Artificial Intelligence at The University of New South Wales
  • Mary Wareham
    Advocacy Director, Arms Division at Human Rights Watch

Show Notes

Lethal autonomous weapons, sometimes called killer robots, are military-grade weapons controlled by artificial intelligence. Some see these devices as an opportunity, while others consider their development to be a major threat. This episode lays out the risks they pose and the controversy around them.

 

From CFR

 

Laying Down the LAWS: Strategizing Autonomous Weapons Governance,” Taylor Sullivan

 

The Pentagon Plans for Autonomous Systems,” Micah Zenko

 

Read More

 

Coming Soon to a Battlefield: Robots That Can Kill,” Atlantic

 

The Pentagon’s ‘Terminator Conundrum’: Robots That Could Kill on Their Own,” New York Times

 

China and the U.S. Are Fighting a Major Battle Over Killer Robots and the Future of AI,” TIME

 

UK, US and Russia among those opposing killer robot ban,” Guardian 

 

Tech leaders: Killer robots would be ‘dangerously destabilizing’ force in the world,” Washington Post

 

Death by algorithm: the age of killer robots is closer than you think,” Vox

 

Watch or Listen

 

The Dawn of Killer Robots,” Motherboard

Trade

Tariffs are often discussed in big, abstract terms—trade wars, economic strategy, global power struggles. But for ginseng farmers in Wisconsin, their effects are painfully personal. In this episode, Why It Matters dives into how tariffs work and how they’re hitting one of America's most niche yet lucrative exports: Wisconsin-grown ginseng.

Trade

Is a trade consensus in Washington even possible? Well, it used to be. In 1989, the Washington Consensus introduced ten economic principles that championed global trade and guided U.S. policy. This vision was embraced for decades, with trade seen as a bridge connecting nations and strengthening economies. However, by 2025, protectionism and trade wars are now threatening to unravel years of cooperation. So how did trade evolve from a symbol of unity to a flash point for global conflict?

Trade

There was once a broad consensus in Washington that trade was a force for good—a way to connect, grow, and prosper. But today, trade has evolved into something much bigger than just the exchange of goods. It’s become a powerful tool to rewrite the rules of foreign policy, reshape how the United States is viewed by the rest of the world, and steer us toward an increasingly uncertain future. When did this change begin, and where did we go off course?  

Top Stories on CFR

Ukraine

Senior U.S. and French officials are meeting in Paris this week as part of President Donald Trump’s effort to negotiate a cease-fire in Ukraine—but the chances of that deal becoming a reality appear increasingly slim.

Middle East and North Africa

Onetime allies, the United States and Iran have seen tensions escalate repeatedly in the four decades since the Islamic Revolution.

Trade

Tariffs and the bleak prospects for global trade dominated discussions at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank Spring Meetings this week in Washington, DC.