The Three Internets

For years, the world thought of the internet as a borderless zone that brought people from around the world together. But as governments pursue very different regulatory paths, the monolithic internet is breaking apart. Now, where there had been one, there are at least three internets: one led by the United States, one by China, and one by the European Union.

Play Button Pause Button
0:00 0:00
  • Gabrielle Sierra
    Podcast Host and Producer
Episode Guests
  • Anu Bradford
    Henry L. Moses Professor of Law and International Organization, Columbia Law School
  • Adam Segal
    Ira A. Lipman Chair in Emerging Technologies and National Security and Director of the Digital and Cyberspace Policy Program
  • Tarah Wheeler
    Senior Fellow for Global Cyber Policy

Show Notes

In its early years, proponents of the internet heralded its ability to transcend national borders, equalize access to information, and even promote democracy. Many predicted that any attempt to regulate freedom of speech on the internet would fail.


Now, governments the world over are pursuing vastly different regulatory frameworks, and the dream of a single, free internet is fading. In the United States, freedom of speech and a laissez-faire approach have led to enormous success for companies such as Apple, Google, and Amazon. At the same time, many analysts say, the U.S. internet is rife with misinformation, toxic content, and “surveillance capitalism.” In China, the Great Firewall and an army of content moderators have successfully brought the digital realm under control of the Chinese Communist Party. And in Europe, regulators have had surprising success implementing protections for data privacy and the “right to be forgotten.”


Will one model eventually win out? And if not, what will a balkanized digital world mean?



From CFR


Justin Sherman, “Russia’s Internet Censor Is Also a Surveillance Machine,” Net Politics


Kathy Huang, “Where Is the Red Line on China’s Internet?,” Asia Unbound


Jason Pielemeier, “Reinvigorating Internet Policy by Doubling Down on Human Rights,” Net Politics


From Our Guests


Adam Segal, The Hacked World Order: How Nations Fight, Trade, Maneuver, and Manipulate in the Digital Age


Adam Segal, “Confronting Reality in Cyberspace: Foreign Policy for a Fragmented Internet," Council on Foreign Relations


Adam Segal, “The Internet Is Fragmented. What Should the United States Do Now?,” Net Politics


Adam Segal, “The Coming Tech Cold War With China,” Foreign Affairs


Tarah Wheeler, Women in Tech: Take Your Career to the Next Level with Practical Advice and Inspiring Stories


Tarah Wheeler, “In Cyberwar, There Are No Rules,” Foreign Policy


Read More


Joy Dong, “China’s Internet Censors Try a New Trick: Revealing Users’ Locations,” New York Times


Moisés Naím, “A World With Three Internets,” El País


Joshua Park, “Breaking the Internet: China-U.S. Competition Over Technology Standards,” The Diplomat


Sarah Cook, “Countering Beijing’s Media Manipulation,” Journal of Democracy


David Silverberg, “How China-U.S. rivalry Is Dividing the Internet,” BBC


Watch and Listen

Russia and China Are in a Battle With the U.S. Over Control of an Obscure Tech Agency,” All Things Considered, NPR

Global Governance

In 2022, several colossal events dominated the headlines, most prominently the war in Ukraine and the worldwide inflation that it helped spark. But beyond Ukraine, events with global implications continued to unfold. In this episode, Why It Matters checks in with three CFR fellows and CFR President Richard Haass to understand the least-covered stories of 2022 and to take a peek at what could await the world in 2023.

International Organizations

The 2022 FIFA World Cup has kicked off in Qatar, and billions of fans worldwide are tuning in to the world’s most popular live event. And yet as in years past, the Qatar Cup is transpiring under the shadow of controversy.

Arms Industries and Trade

The global arms trade is big business and the United States accounts for more than 40 percent of the world’s weapons exports. Aside from the profit motivation, selling arms abroad can be an effective foreign policy tool, allowing the United States to exert influence over conflict and security worldwide without having to put boots on the ground. But are the risks worth the reward?

Top Stories on CFR


This interactive examines how nationwide bans on menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars, as proposed by the Biden administration on April 28, 2022, could help shrink the racial gap on U.S. lung cancer death rates.


Sheila Smith, the John E. Merow senior fellow for Asia-Pacific studies at the Council, sits down with James M. Lindsay to discuss the reasoning behind Japan’s new defense strategy and the Japanese government’s decision to double defense spending.

United States

In addition to minority communities and those on the political left, far-right and white supremacist extremism threatens violence against institutions conservatives cherish as well, such as the U.S. military.